1964 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2011 Volvo C70
To start off, 2011 Volvo C70 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 350 kg more than 2011 Volvo C70.
Because 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Eldorado | 2011 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Eldorado | C70 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |