1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1954 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 640 kg more than 1954 Ford Crestline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1954 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Sixty | Crestline |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2940 mm |
