1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire (215 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 823 kg more than 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | Sixty | Jetfire |
Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3531 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1297 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |