1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 1977 Mazda 616 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Sixty | 616 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |
