1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1979 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1979 Lotus Eclat is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1979 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1979 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Sixty | Eclat |
Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |