1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 1979 Seat 131 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Seat 131, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1979 Seat 131 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | Sixty | 131 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |