1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 210 kg more than 1982 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | Sixty | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3090 mm |
