1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1983 Fiat 127
To start off, 1983 Fiat 127 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Fiat 127. (49 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1983 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1983 Fiat 127 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Sixty | 127 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2230 mm |