1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 938 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Sixty | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |