1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 1987 Acura Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1987 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1987 Acura Integra.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1987 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | Sixty | Integra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
