1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1987 Holden Astra
To start off, 1987 Holden Astra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1987 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1987 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1987 Holden Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Sixty | Astra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2420 mm |
