1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1990 Ford Granada
To start off, 1990 Ford Granada is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1990 Ford Granada. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 780 kg more than 1990 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1990 Ford Granada | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Granada |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2770 mm |