1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (200 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Sixty | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |