1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1990 Mazda 626
To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1990 Mazda 626. (116 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1990 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 815 kg more than 1990 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1990 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | 626 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |