1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1994 Ford Contour
To start off, 1994 Ford Contour is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1994 Ford Contour. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Contour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 878 kg more than 1994 Ford Contour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1994 Ford Contour | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Contour |
Year Released | 1964 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |