1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1995 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | Sixty | Niva |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 42 L |
