1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Honda Accord
To start off, 1999 Honda Accord is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1999 Honda Accord. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda Accord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 710 kg more than 1999 Honda Accord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Honda Accord | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Sixty | Accord |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |