1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Kia Retona
To start off, 1999 Kia Retona is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1999 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 250 kg more than 1999 Kia Retona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Kia Retona | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Sixty | Retona |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |