1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 650 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | Sixty | F1 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
