1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (194 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 485 kg more than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Sixty | X-Type |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |