1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 770 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | Sixty | XF |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1240 mm |
