1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (205 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 246 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | Sixty | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 205 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 74 L |