1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Proton 400 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2005 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2005 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2005 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Proton 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Proton |
Model | Sixty | 400 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |