1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Outback (250 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 473 kg more than 2005 Subaru Outback.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | Sixty | Outback |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1647 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |