1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Sixty | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |
