1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Ford F-350
To start off, 2006 Ford F-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 912 kg more than 2006 Ford F-350.
Because 2006 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Sixty | F-350 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 6801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 362 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 6240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 110 L |
