1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2007 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Commander weights approximately 780 kg more than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2007 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Sixty | Commander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 2900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 78 L |