1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 350 kg more than 2008 Land Rover Freelander.
Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Sixty | Freelander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |