1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML. (167 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 55 kg more than 1964 Cadillac Sixty.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | ML |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 2175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 83 L |