1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (404 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 485 kg more than 2009 Cadillac Escalade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Sixty | Escalade |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 404 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2120 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 117 L |