1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (179 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 520 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Cadillac Sixty 2010 Cadillac BLS
Make Cadillac Cadillac
Model Sixty BLS
Year Released 1964 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7027 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2120 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 5670 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 58 L