1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Ranger |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 74 L |