1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | Sixty | A6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |