1964 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Sixty | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Sixty | UTE |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |