1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 1969 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1969 Holden Belmont is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,129 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 640 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 1969 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | 2CV | Belmont |
Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |