1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 1970 Matra-Simca M530
To start off, 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Matra-Simca M530 (71 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Matra-Simca M530 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Matra-Simca M530 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 1970 Matra-Simca M530 | |
| Make | Citroen | Matra-Simca |
| Model | 2CV | M530 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
