1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 1979 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1979 Suzuki Cervo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 539 cc (3 cylinders), 1979 Suzuki Cervo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Suzuki Cervo (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Suzuki Cervo should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Citroen 2CV weights approximately 25 kg more than 1979 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1979 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 1979 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
| Model | 2CV | Cervo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |
