1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Musso is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Citroen | SsangYong |
Model | 2CV | Musso |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |