1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 1998 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1998 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Mustang weights approximately 830 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 1998 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |