1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2002 Fiat Palio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,368 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Fiat Palio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Palio (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Palio should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Palio weights approximately 465 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Fiat Palio | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | 2CV | Palio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |