1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Honda Z
To start off, 2002 Honda Z is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 656 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 Honda Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Z (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Z weights approximately 400 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Honda Z | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | 2CV | Z |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 35 L |