1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2005 Infiniti FX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Infiniti FX (280 HP) has 262 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Infiniti FX weights approximately 1304 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Infiniti FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Infiniti FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Infiniti FX | |
Make | Citroen | Infiniti |
Model | 2CV | FX |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 280 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 90 L |