1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2006 Opel Tigra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Opel Tigra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Tigra (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Tigra should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Citroen | Opel |
Model | 2CV | Tigra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |