1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2006 Skoda Superb is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Skoda Superb (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Skoda Superb weights approximately 1016 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | 2CV | Superb |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2771 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 62 L |