1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2007 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | 2CV | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 100 L |
