1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Tata Indica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Tata Indica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Tata Indica (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Tata Indica should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Tata Indica weights approximately 445 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Tata Indica | |
Make | Citroen | Tata |
Model | 2CV | Indica |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 37 L |