1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2010 GMC Sierra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Sierra (315 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1758 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2010 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Citroen | GMC |
Model | 2CV | Sierra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2032 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 98 L |