1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | 2CV | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |