1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Volvo V70
To start off, 2010 Volvo V70 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo V70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | V70 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |
