1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 BMW 116
To start off, 2012 BMW 116 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 116 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 116 (116 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 116 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 116 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW 116 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 116. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 2012 BMW 116 | |
| Make | Citroen | BMW |
| Model | 2CV | 116 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4324 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 51 L |
